(3) Darwin’s theory [10]
Supporters of this theory tried to use it to explain the existence of living beings. This theory has a wide distribution, many people try to spread it with good intentions, believing it is a scientific fact, while others try to spread it with malice, because it satisfies their desire to show that religion is wrong in stating that man was created. Critics of religion seek scientific evidence to support your position and deceive people.
What does this theory?
This theory claims that all creatures originated in small organisms that appeared and developed in (and) water, then their environment affects them promoting new features. These characteristics, over millions of years, led to the development of other advanced features that changed early this creature in a higher life form. The development of features caused by the changing environment and continued until he reached the present appearance of human beings.
The basis of this theory
(1) This theory is based on observations made during paleontological excavations carried out at the time of Darwin. The researchers found that the levels (layers) showed earliest remains of primitive life forms, and levels coming on these life forms had developed progressively. Darwin said: “These animals developed are the result of the evolution of early life forms and primitive.”
(2) was also based on what was known in Darwin’s time about the similarity between embryos of different animals in the early stages of development that gave the impression that the origin of all animals was the same as their embryos appear equal, and that evolution on earth was in a similar way to the development of the embryo in the womb of the living.
(3) was also based on the existence of the appendix in humans, which helps in the digestion of plant material to other species, but no longer has any function in man. This gave the impression that this was a similarity to other primates did not evolve, and that this appendix does work in primates.
Darwin’s explanation about the process of evolution
(1) Natural Selection. The various natural factors eliminate the weaker specimens, leaving the strongest specimens. This is what is known as the principle of “survival of the fittest (or the strongest).” Only the strong survive specimens and inherit its strengths to their offspring. These strong features are combined with each other over time to form a new trait in the species. This is the “evolution” that does the specimen developed a superior specimen. This continuous development is the evolution.
(2) Sexual Selection. This postulate states that both males and females of each species give preference to mate, the strongest specimens, so that the characteristics of the strongest survive and that the characteristics of the weak are eliminated due to the reluctance of other to mate with them.
(3) Each time a new feature emerges is inherited by the offspring.
Refutation of the basis on which this theory is based
Paleontology is not a precise science, and no one can claim to have conducted a comprehensive survey of all strata of the earth, including those under the mountains and oceans, and have not found anything new that will challenge the previously held concepts.
Even if we assumed that the findings from this branch of science (ie, Paleontology) are correct, the fact that there have first primitive life forms to more advanced creatures that followed does not prove that the more advanced forms were developed from primitive counterparts. All it shows is the order (chronologically) of his existence, which may simply be a reflection of the changes that occurred in the environment in which they lived these different life forms at different times. The opinion of Paleontology at the time of Darwin was that the man appeared 600,000 years ago, the recent discoveries in the field of paleontology have measured the age of man in 10 million years.
Does this not show that paleontology is a science in flux, whose evidence is not conclusive and in which we can not rely? Maybe tomorrow paleontologists discover something completely contrary to what we assumed!
Dr. Mustafa Shakir Salim in his commentary on the book fil Mir’âh Al Insan (Man in the Mirror) of author Clyde Colquhoun which Neanderthal man speaks to supporters say Darwin’s theory was the first man to evolve monkeys and gorillas … said: “Neanderthal Man is described in the following major natural features: a larger brain than modern man, and a large skull and wide … besides that, the evolutionary chain that paleontologists are trying to outline is not complete, there is something known as the ‘missing link’. “
Dr. Surial Tasaddu said in his book ‘Darwin Madhhab (The Collapse of the Theory of Darwin):
(1) The missing links in the evolutionary chain are missing not only between men and ways of life before him, but there is also missing links between primitive life forms of unicellular and multicellular forms, including molluscs and arthropods , between invertebrates and fish and amphibians, between the previous and reptiles, between reptiles and humans. I have mentioned in the chronological order of appearance of these in the geological eras.
(2) The similarities between embryos of different species: it is a serious mistake committed by some scientists because the microscopes of the time were not advanced enough to show microscopic differences in the formation of embryos from different species. We add to this, forgery perpetrated by the German evolutionist Ernst Haeckel scientist who juxtaposed drawings of similar embryos. Being criticized by some embryologist, he admitted that he had to “tweak” approximately eight percent of the drawings to make them appear similar to each other, because they were different.
(3) With regard to the human appendix is a “waste” evolutionary phase of the monkey, this does not prove definitively that man evolved from monkeys. The reason for the appendix in humans may have inherited it as the first human being who was fed exclusively on plants, and has been created to help digest the plant material. Moreover, it is quite possible that science discovers in the future the role of the human appendix. Science is moving forward.
If the hermaphroditism is characteristic of lower life forms, and having two genders is a characteristic of more developed life forms, and if having nipples is a sign of femininity, then why is it that we find the male elephant have nipples like the human male, while males ungulates [11] as horses and donkeys do not? If Darwin claimed that man evolved from lower life forms, why is that we find the trace of hermaphroditism in man and not in lower life forms?
Refuting Darwin’s explanation of how evolution works
(1) Darwin says there is a law whose objective is the extermination and extinction of living things so that only the strongest and fittest survive and ‘pass’ their characteristics to their offspring, until the strong features combine to form a new species. Certainly there is a law whose objective is the annihilation of all living things, strong and weak alike, and that Allah has decreed death to all living beings. But there is also a companion law, a symbiosis of living beings and their environment, because when Allah created life, also created the means to maintain it. Thus, we see the sun, ocean, wind, rain, plants, gravity and many other creations cooperate to maintain human and animal life.
Focusing only on the destructive factors, ignoring the factors motivating support an imbalance in the way of thinking. If there is a law of death or destruction, then there is also a law of life, and each plays a role in it. Although natural forces such as wind, thunder, heat, water, storms, etc. can harm people or destroy their achievements – leaving them blind or destroy the buildings – it is impossible to believe that these irrational, involuntary inanimate natural forces are able to create you an eye that does not have one, or to regenerate what is at state decomposition.
It is reasonable to say that natural forces can be destructive or fatal, but it is unreasonable to say that these forces behind this perfect and wonderful creation in which everything is formed in a perfect manner and systematic so that their parts fit together with amazing precision , working in perfect harmony. Perfection is impossible to attribute this to the work of blind and irrational forces of nature.
Jamal Uddin Al Afghani said in his book Ar-Radd ‘Ala ad-Dahriîn – The Refutation of atheists – to discuss this theory: “… May I ask, how is that every separate part of a living being knows what other parties are trying to achieve since each one of them has a different function? Why do some media to understand other what you do? … How is it that these parties know – when they are still in the egg of the bird for example, that should be a bird that eats grain, which must have a beak and wings?
The Darwinian principle of survival of the fittest has destroyed human life, he has served as a justification for every oppressor, whether it is an individual or a government. When the oppressor commits an injustice, takes possession of what is not theirs, war breaks out, etc. he did not think you’re doing something wrong – rather, he believes he is following a natural law, according to Darwin’s claims, the law of survival of the fittest. This claim led to the ugly excesses of colonialism.
(2) Natural selection, the tendency to mate with only the strongest individuals that motivates the extinction of the weakest individuals, there is proof that evolution has occurred in this species. What do we mean by this is that stronger individuals of a species survive while the weaker specimens disappear.
If evolutionary change occurs in a specimen has the effect of mating decreased desire in it, because the attraction between males and females of a species decreases as the physical and genetic differences between them. This is what the famous scientist suggested Duwayr Zansky in 1958, a century after Darwin. Zansky said: “The physical difference weakens the reproductive instinct evolved specimen, as the desire to mate decreases as the difference between the specimens (evolved and unevolved). And it is true that the new features in a specimen can be passed genetically to offspring. “
For example, a muscular blacksmith does not convey the strength of your muscles to their descendants as well as the sage wisdom not genetically transmitted to their children.
(3) The suggestion that some features emerge accidentally and then are inherited by the offspring has been rejected by the science of genetics. Any property that is not carried in the genes is earned or acquired property that can not be inherited by offspring.
Nabel Professor George, a prominent scientist in this field, says: “For that reason, natural selection does not explain the theory of evolution. Just explained that the weakest will die, and that some features predominate among the members of the species. Those speaking of ‘evolutionary leaps’ mean that an animal that originally had no eye are suddenly formed an action because some rays.
Some scholars have shown that X-rays may cause changes in the number of genes, but this change occurs in something that already exists, the rays do not create anything. The number of genes in a monkey differs from the number of genes from a human. X-rays affect only existing genes, how could these rays do not have any form of intelligence created intelligence in man, which distinguishes it from monkeys and other animals?
These rays can affect the genes, but this effect distorts reality (deformation) rather than improving, as is the case of atomic rays (radiation). This plus the fact that the science of genetics refutes Darwin’s theory, as experience has shown us. Jews and Muslims, have been circumcising their sons for centuries, but this has not led to any of your children born and circumcised. The more science advances, Darwin’s theory proves to be more and more wrong.
The reality does not support this theory
(1) If this theory were correct, we would be witnessing the emergence of many animals and people through evolution, not only through reproduction. Even being that the development requires a long time, this does not mean we can not face monkeys evolve into men.
(2) Even if we accept that the natural circumstances and natural selection became a monkey man, for example, we can not accept that these circumstances also dictated that a woman has been formed to accompany this man to be played and there is a balance between them.
(3) The ability to adapt what we see in creatures like the chameleon that changes its color depending on the place where it is, is a skill inherent in the formation of this creature. This is born with this ability which exists in some and is barely present in others. All creatures have limits that can not happen. The ability to adapt is an innate potential, a feature developed is not motivated by the environment and the proponents of this theory say. If so, the environment would have forced the rocks, dirt, and other inanimate objects to adapt.
(4) The man frogs are distinguished by their ability to live both on land and in water. Birds of man are distinguished by their ability to fly and speed of movement. The smell of a dog is more sensitive than a human – is the dog smell more advanced than the human? Are the frogs and birds more advanced than humans in some respects? The eyes of the camel, horse and donkey are clearly visible both day and night, while human eyes are unable to see in the dark. An eagle’s vision is more acute than the human. So eagles and donkeys are more advanced than man? If we take the self as a basis of superiority, then the plants are superior to men and all animals, because they make their own food and do not need to replenish them.
If we take the size as a basis of superiority, then the camels and elephants and prehistoric animals (eg dinosaurs) would be superior to man.
The attitude of scholars on this theory naturalists
(1) Those who support this theory. His reason for supporting it is primarily to support freedom of thought that the Church banned and persecuted. Natural scientists launched a war against the priests of the Church and his thinking after the conflict between the two sides took a violent turn.
(2) Those who oppose it. These require tangible evidence that natural selection has changed for any species, particularly human. Those who oppose it because they want natural proofs are fewer in number or in their determination to resist that theologians in Europe who also oppose.
Here are some of the views of scientists who oppose this theory cited by Prof. Ibrahim Hurani: “Scientists have been unable to prove the theory of Darwin, in fact they have been refuted and criticized the ….” Among them are scientists and Dallas Nechel whose comments can be summarized as follows: “Evolution by natural selection can not be applied in the case of man it can only have been created directly.”
Another scientist, Farkhar, said: “We made clear that real life is a big difference between humans and monkeys. We can not say with certainty that man is descended from apes or any other animal, so we should not say such a thing. “
Another scientist, Mivart, he said, after examining the realities of life in detail: “Darwin’s theory is unacceptable and is a child view.”
Von Biskoun said after he and Farkhar conducted a comparative study of humans and apes: “The difference between the two is basic and very big …”
Agassiz said, in a study presented at a seminar on Victorian science, Darwin’s theory was false and was in fact wrong, his methods had nothing to do with science, and his theory was not helpful.
Huxley was a skeptic and friend of Darwin, said considering the evidence that we can never prove that any plant or animal developed through either natural selection or artificial selection.
Tyndall, who was like Haeckel, said: “Certainly those who believe in evolution are not aware of the fact that this is based on principles that have not been demonstrated (ie, are hypothetical principles). It is obvious that Darwin’s theory needs change. “
A theory and not fact
For all these reasons, what Darwin said about evolution is called ‘the theory of evolution. ” For scientists, there is a difference between a theory and a fact or law. According to his terminology, a theory is something that can be true or false, while a fact or law is something that can not be false.
So why is it that is so widespread?
The reason why this theory is so widespread is that it came at a time when God decreed that the Western scientific community rebelled against the intellectual tyranny of the Church and Christian fundamentalism. The advancement of science played an important role in exposing the falsity of certain arguments of Christian fundamentalism that led to the eruption of a vicious clash between science and Christianity, which many scientists were sentenced and executed. In this heated argument, both sides made use of every weapon at their disposal, and this theory was extended as a weapon used by scientists against their own religion, and later against the religion of every land they colonized. They did this because they believed that the theory was correct, and by way of revenge against the Christian religion, which had tried to prevent the development of scientific research. Then, this theory was used as a means to destroy the religions of the colonized nations, making it easier for colonial domination over its colonies.
Consequently, the colonial education system, after destroying the religion of the people, imposed the study of this theory in the formal educational program, presenting it with scientific and scholarly look for students to believe that is true, thus instilling in the minds of students the mistaken notion that science-or at least his fake-science contradicts religion, so looking for people to reject their religion (and adopt that of their oppressors).
Enough for the reader to know that this theory because many Muslims have deviated from their religion. For this reason the colonists insisted on teaching this theory to Muslim children in their schools to be that U.S. law banning the teaching of this theory in its schools since 1935.
But in Europe, and after the coup de grace to hit his deviant religion, scientists announced that Darwin’s theory-which is constantly used in their struggle against religion was not a scientific fact was only a theory, The more they advance the science, the clearer it to the falsity of the theory.
The Koran and Darwin’s theory
When the Qur’an speaks about the past, people should listen and pay attention.
(And when the Qur’aan is recited listen to it and be silent …) (Qur’an 7: 204) – because it comes from Knowing, the Omniscient, the One whose knowledge encompasses all things. What do you know the man? Compared with the knowledge of Allah, he knows nothing.
(… Allah knows and you do not know.) (Qur’an 2: 216) And how is not going to know about the affairs of His creatures that He created them to be?
(Is not gonna know who created it? He is Subtle, and is aware of what you do.) (Qur’an 67: 14)
How come people are so bold and insolent to talk about their origins being that did not witness the moment of creation?
(Know that I will no witnesses [or Iblis or their offspring] of the creation of the heavens and the earth, nor of her own creation …) (Qur’an 18: 51).
It is because they were not witnessed the creation of their people that their successes on the subject are few and their many mistakes.
The truth is contrary to this theory
What the All-Knowing All-Knowing, Creator of man, says is diametrically opposed to what these ignorant people say. Allah, the Exalted, tells us that He created man as a creature full and independent. He reported them to His angels about its creation even before creating it.
(And when your Lord said to the angels: I will set a generation after generation [of men] in the land …) (Qur’an 2: 30) [12]
Allâh, high and exalted, has informed us about the substance of that He created man. He created him from earth
(… Know that we’ve created [from Adam] of land …) (Qur’an 22: 5)
Abu Musa Al Ash’ari said, “I heard the Messenger of Allah (Peace and Blessings of Allah be upon him) said: ‘Allah created Adam from a handful of earth that he picked up the entire Earth, which is why Adam’s children vary as the soil varies, some are red, some are white, some are black, and some are of intermediate colors [13], some are friendly, others are difficult, some are bad and some are good. ” [14]
Water is (also) one of the elements of creation of man:
(And Allah created every living thing from water …) (Qur’an 24: 45)
Man was created from water and earth (ie, mud):
(It is He Who created you from clay …) (Qur’an 6: 2)
This became muddy clay, as clay pottery,
(He created man of clay like pottery …) (Qur’an 55: 14)
Allâh, high and exalted, created man in His hands
(Allah said: O Iblis! What prevents you from bowing before what I created with My hands? …) (Qur’an 38: 75)
Allah, the Exalted, created Adam hollow at first. According to the hadith narrated by Anas (Allah be pleased with him), the Messenger of Allah (Peace and Blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “When God formed Adam in Paradise, He said let there the time he wanted, and Iblis began to spin around him, watching him. When Iblis saw that Adam was hollow, he knew that this was a creature that was not strong (read: strong). “[15]
Allah, the Exalted, breathed into this clay of His Spirit, and life got in, and Adam began to hear, see, speak, think and be conscious. Allah ordered the angels to bow down to Adam when he breathed into him of His Spirit and life came into him.
(And if it was shaped and have breathed into him his spirit, make a bow before him.) (Qur’an 38: 72)
Allah, the High, informs us about where he did live after you have created:
(We said: O Adam! Dwell thou and thy wife in Paradise …) (Qur’an 2: 35)
No sooner was completed creation, Adam began to talk and understand what was said:
(He taught Adam the names of all things, then exposed them to the Angels and said: Tell me their names, if you tell the truth.
They said: Glory be to You! We have no knowledge except what You have given us, You are All-Knowing, Wise.
He said: O Adam! Tell them their names ..) (Qur’an, 2: 31-33) Abu Hurairah (Allah be pleased with him) said: The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “When Allah created Adam and breathed into him His Spirit, Adam sneezed and said, ‘Al hamdu Lillah (praise be to Allah),’ praise to Allah by His permission. The Lord said, ‘May Allah have mercy on you, O Adam. Go to those Angels – a group of angels who were seated, ‘and say, As-Salamu’ alaikum. ‘They said, “Wa’ As-Salam alaîk ua rahmatullah.” [16]
The first man was Adam who is the father of all people. Adam, Allah, the Almighty, created his wife Haua ‘(Eva)
(O mankind, fear your Lord who created you from a single being, which his wife created and sent down for two many men and women …) (Qur’an 4: 1)
The man was not created imperfect, later to be completed as intended by proponents of the theory of evolution. On the contrary, it was complete, after its formation began to diminish in size and strength. According to a hadith narrated by Al Bukhari and Muslim in his Saheeh from Abu Hurairah, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “Allah created Adam and his height was sixty cubits [17]. So the believers enter Paradise physically perfect, in the form of Adam. The rest of the hadith said: “All those who enter Paradise will enter in the form of Adam, whose height was threescore cubits.” Then he (Prophet) said: “The human form has been declining (in height) from that time until now.” [18]
This is a brief summary of what the Quran and Hadith say about the creation of man. We have not mentioned all the texts of the Qur’an and Sunnah to address this issue, but what we have discussed provides a clear picture leaving no room for confusion and imagination. This is what Islam says about the noble origins of man and should be proud.
This idea about ancient man that was and is taught by scholars and teachers of history, which presents it as a savage who can not speak and can not do anything right, that learns from the animals, has disgraced the noble origin man.
Conclusion
It’s time to wake up and return to our religion based on the Book of our Lord, who is full of goodness. This book tells what happened before us and what will happen in the future. It is a serious issue, and is not a game, and who follow the guide from any other source will be lost …
It’s time to stay away from the tenets of corrupt minds in such areas, ie in matters on which Allâh has spoken clearly and leaving no room for people’s opinions.
We must end this intellectual loss has made us hurry to accept every new thing without stopping to think. We only realize our mistakes as those that originated and disseminated perish.
[10] Az-Zindani, Kitab At-Tawheed, 3 / 81.
[11] Animals with hooves.
[12] [When Your Lord Told So the angels: "I am Placing an overlord on earth."] – TB Irving. [Behold, thy Lord Said to the angels: "I will create a vicegerent on earth."] – A. Yusuf Ali.
[13] That is, between white and black, red and white, etc..
[14] Ahmad, At-Tirmidhi and Abu Daûud (Mishkat Al Masabih, 1 / 36, no. 100).
[15] Muslim, 4 / 2016, no. 2611.
[16] At-Tirmidhi, Mishkat al Masabih, 2 / 542, no. 4662. The editor of Al Mishkat said, was classed as saheeh by al-Hakim and adh-Dhahabi seconded. And what they both said is correct.
[17] Bukhari, 6 / 362, no. 3326; Muslim, 4 / 2183, no. 2841. This wording is Bukhari.
[18] Ibid. Here the language cited is narrated by Muslim.
